|
One day, Eunny Jang, editor of Interweave Knits, decided she wanted to be a Knitting Daily
Gallery Gal, too. Here are some photos of Eunny in garments from the
Summer 2008 issue--but this time, Eunny herself provides some
commentary, before asking me to add my own. What fun!
Drawstring Raglan
Her bust: 34" Sample garment measures 32.75", so Eunny is wearing it with 1.25" negative ease.
|
 |
|
 |
Eunny's comments:
This one’s easy.
It’s a very simple, flattering silhouette, easily adjustable because of
the drawstring. About the only thing I’d do is knit it in different
colors, and maybe lower the empire waistline just a little bit (by
knitting a few more rows before starting the armholes) to make the
drawstring fall truly under the bust. I might also narrow and/or
lengthen the sleeves – this precise length on me tends to widen my
shoulders, and I’m always struggling to correct proportion.
Sandi's comments:
Since Eunny has
broad shoulders and is a bit busty, I might want to shorten the sleeves
just the tiniest bit--even a half-inch or so would help to soften the
triangular path that leads the eye straight from bust to shoulder and
back again. (This path is echoed by the little lapels, which are
extremely cute, but which help to visually widen her top half even
more.) Hm, that said...maybe taking in some of the fullness of the
sleeve would help with this as well. Lengthening the skirt section, by
adding the few rows necessary to lower the waistline, will also give a
bit more length and depth to the colorwork section, thus providing more
balance to the larger top section.
|
Leaf Kimono
Her bust: 34" Sample garment measures 37.5", so Eunny is wearing it with 3.5" positive ease.
|
 |
|
 |
Eunny's comments:
I’d wear a
different top under this – probably a simple camisole or tank, and keep
it tied pretty tightly in the back to keep it from spreading across my
shoulders. It’s a very forgiving look, though, and I probably wouldn’t
change the size. I might raise the convergence point of the shoulder
pieces and waistline, however, by just an inch or so – probably by
knitting a longer “point” to the bottom piece, and shortening the
shoulder pieces.
Sandi's comments:
Deep V-necklines
are indeed very attractive for busty gals--but only if the V does not
end right at the bustline! The V-neck here needs to be either higher,
or lower, in order to keep the eye from settling on a part Eunny might
not wish to have folks settle on. (I have noticed in my own clothing
that even an inch or two higher or lower makes a huge difference in
balancing my overall look.)
|
Roped Shell
Her bust: 34" Sample garment measures 33.25", so Eunny is wearing it with 0.75" negative ease.
|
 |
|
 |
Eunny's comments:
The silk fabric
of this shell creates really lovely, flattering drape on all bodies.
I’d probably wear it like this – over a shirt with sleeves – to dress
it down, or by itself under a fitted jacket. I might add just a little
length to the body and raise the neckline a bit, but that’s really
personal preference.
Sandi's comments:
I agree--the
neckline could come up a bit, not for any reasons of modesty, but
again, because the drape ends too close to the widest part of the bust.
Pulling it up even by an inch would preserve the charming drape and
keep the eye moving along. If you need more emphasis in the bustline,
by all means--keep that cable close to where you want the emphasis!
|
Elinor
Her bust: 34" Sample garment measures 32", so Eunny is wearing it with 2" negative ease.
|
 |
|
 |
Eunny's comments:
I love this
shell! The colorwork band draws attention down and balances my
proportions, and the square neckline is an unexpected detail. I might
cut the armholes in a little more to visually narrow the shoulders and
make it more wearable over a shirt, but that’s about it. This
is one of those fabulous fixit kind of patterns: The colorwork band’s
the main attraction, so place it where it makes the most sense on you.
I’d rather draw attention away from my top half, but if you’d like to
draw the eye up, you can always place the band around the bust. Fixed!
Sandi's comments:
Anyone who
followed my adventures with Wendy's Tomato knows how I feel about her
colorwork bands: Move 'em if you need to! But just as a note of
interest: Every single Gallery Gal who tried on this top was afraid of
the placement of the hip band and how it would make her look. In almost
every single case, the hip band turned out to look simply amazing. Why?
I think this particular combination of pattern and color keeps your eye
moving vertically as well as horizontally; I think that the band is
wide enough that it has unexpectedly good effects on a lot of figures.
I also think that having the matching turquoise trim at the neck helps
keep the eye moving vertically between band and trim, instead of
horizontally at the hip.
Still: Move That Stripe! If you want to, that is.
|
Wallis Cardigan
Her bust: 34" Sample garment measures 33.25", so Eunny is wearing it with 0.75" negative ease.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
Eunny's comments:
This one is so
hard for me! I love this silhouette so, so much, but the puffed sleeves
broaden my already-broad shoulders, and they fall at a bit of an
awkward length on me – right around my bustline – which only adds
width. I’d either knit the sleeves longer or shorter (or take then away
altogether for a beautifully detailed vest), and probably take away a
bit of their fullness. I might also shorten the cardi a little bit, to
take away some of the blouson effect at the waistline – I don’t have
much waist definition, so blousons are not really for me. The deep V
shape is extremely flattering, however, to those with full busts.
Sandi's comments:
I agree, the
sleeves here are not flattering on Eunny. I actually agree with her
that the most flattering look for her might be to forgo the sleeves
entirely and have the most darling vest ever. Other than that...I kind
of want her to lengthen the patterned section at the hips a bit, to
balance out the lovely top section. Maybe one or two extra "stripes" of
that section, not much more.
|