Knitting Daily with Sandi » Looking In The Mirror

Looking In The Mirror

Visit our Online Store for great patterns!

Central Park Hoodie - Knitting Pattern Central Park Hoodie
The popular hoodie pattern with expanded sizes
Knitting Store Details Button
Babette Blanket - Knitting Pattern Babette Blanket
This blanket offers a journey in color for the crocheter.
Knitting Store Details Button
Sideways Spencer - New Knitting Pattern Sideways Spencer
Early nineteenth-century fashion with twenty-first century appeal.
Knitting Store Details Button



"You Are Beautiful." This phrase was taped to the frame of every bathroom mirror in my grandparents' home, a bit of whimsy-with-a-message provided by my mischievous, loving grandpa for his visiting granddaughters. For years, I'd look at that phrase and think, "Yeah, right" and then try to find something else--something not me--to look at whilst washing my hands. It was so hard for me to believe that a plump, bespectacled teenager with brown hair, brown eyes, and olive skin could be anything even close to beautiful.

Sometimes, there are definite advantages to being all grownup--such as being able to see beauty in all its forms, in real women and real men of all shapes, sizes, and colors. As I read your comments and emails the past few days, the words my grandfather put on the mirror kept coming back to me, over and over: You Are Beautiful. Your passion and desire to knit well-fitting garments for yourselves, no matter your size or shape, shows that deep inside yourself, no matter what society says, you, too, know that you are beautiful.

So how beautiful are you? Above are the results of the Sizing Survey, which was filled out by a staggering 8,974 people since it was posted last Wednesday. As so many of you pointed out, the survey only asked about bust size, which I chose because it is the measurement used by most knitting patterns as a determinant of pattern sizing. However, bust size alone isn't an accurate gauge of what will fit you--and what will look good on you. So I'm looking into devising a survey that will cover a number of critical measurements, giving us a much more accurate picture of how beautiful you all REALLY are!

For now, however, there are the results of the Sizing Survey from last week.

Interesting, huh? Was that what you expected to see, or not?




An Essential Tool for Every Knitter (and Crocheter)

This year, for Christmas, I'm asking for a full-length mirror, one of those freestanding oval mirrors with a nice wood frame. I'll make sure there is really good lighting in the corner where that mirror will go, and then, once I have it all set up, I'm going to paint or stencil or somehow emblazon the top of the mirror with my grandfather's words: "You Are Beautiful."

The mirror isn't just sentimental--a full-length mirror is an important tool for any knitter (or crocheter), in order to get to know the body you are knitting for, to get a clear view of how your knitted garments fit, and to learn what works (and what doesn't work) on your particular shape. Wherever you place your mirror, make sure that you have good lighting so you can really see what's what! If looking in the mirror intimidates you, then give yourself some encouragement: hang pretty scarves above the mirror, light a candle, play nice music--and maybe try putting one of my grandpa's little labels somewhere on the frame.




One Garment, Different Women

This week's featured free pattern is the Corset Pullover by Robin Melanson. After reading all your requests to see photos of garments on different-sized people, I managed to talk some of the gals around the office into trying this one on for you! I'll have those photos and more for you Wednesday and Friday.





Sandi Wiseheart is the editor of Knitting Daily.

What's on Sandi's needles today? The Bonsai Tunic by Norah Gaughan. Almost done stitching up the side seams...photo coming soon of the finished item!





Posted Aug 13 2007, 12:00 AM by KD Sandi
Filed under: , ,

Comments

ChrissT wrote re: Looking In The Mirror
on Mon, Aug 13 2007 5:53 PM
It's comforting to know that I am "average" when it comes to size. Now if we could just have the fashion industry realize what that average is.
FleecyD wrote re: Looking In The Mirror
on Mon, Aug 13 2007 6:16 PM
It's nice to know that I'm not too far over the "average". And as mentioned above...it would be nice if the fashion industry realized that average is not under 28"!
SharonH wrote re: Looking In The Mirror
on Mon, Aug 13 2007 6:21 PM
Honestly, I didn't expect the mode to be so tiny. I guess it's just that I'm large-framed and I don't even think the circumfrence of my ribs would be that small.
SharonH wrote re: Looking In The Mirror
on Mon, Aug 13 2007 6:21 PM
Honestly, I didn't expect the mode to be so tiny. I guess it's just that I'm large-framed and I don't even think the circumfrence of my ribs would be that small.
DeniseC wrote re: Looking In The Mirror
on Mon, Aug 13 2007 6:39 PM
I am confused - there are two bars under each size. What does the second bar mean?
Lucille Reilly wrote re: Looking In The Mirror
on Mon, Aug 13 2007 6:43 PM
Wait a minute! There are 10 bust-measurement ranges listed on the graph, and >19< bars. Which ten belong to the graph, and what are the other nine for??
SharonH wrote re: Looking In The Mirror
on Mon, Aug 13 2007 6:47 PM
Engineer lady here.

To those confused about the graph, notice that the full range isn't covered by the size listings on the left. The blank ones start at the largest value of the bar below and go to the lowest value of the bar above.

i.e. The first blank bar is 28"-30", the second blank bar is 32"-34"
LindaM wrote re: Looking In The Mirror
on Mon, Aug 13 2007 6:50 PM
I'm really interested in the pull-over corset pattern, and glad you will be posting other pictures because the picture on the pattern is really difficult to actually see what it is...
KD Sandi wrote re: Looking In The Mirror
on Mon, Aug 13 2007 6:57 PM
*****Sandi here, re: the graph. Actually we didn't have room to squeeze in all the size ranges from the survey, so the inbetween bars belong to the inbetween ranges. For example, the bar between 30-32 and 34-36 is the bar for 32-34. Sorry, should have added a note about that earlier! (In other words, Sharon The Engineer Lady is correct....)
Moms knitting wrote re: Looking In The Mirror
on Mon, Aug 13 2007 6:57 PM
I'm definitely up there with a bunch of other knitters when it comes to size! I'm glad to know it. I am curious about the other measurements too, since I wonder how average I am there.

Great idea about the mirror, it can really help to know what works and what doesn't instead of finding yourself out in the world and catching a glimpse of that pretty woman or that huge woman depending on if a style works for your body or not.
LynetteM wrote re: Looking In The Mirror
on Mon, Aug 13 2007 7:02 PM
If I interpret the graph correctly, more than 30% of the survey respondents are size medium or above. This definitely indicates patterns should have a greater range in the larger sizes.

However, as someone who is a size Petite Small I feel compelled to chime in.

I don't fit in any cookie cutter sizes. That's just the way life is for me and I try to alter patterns to suit.

Perhaps instead of offering patterns in every possible size and shape, the more effective way would be to suggest where and when patterns can be adjusted.

Or perhaps have a tutorial on how to resize commercial patterns.

I'm not really surprised by the results of the sizing survey, but I am interested in what Interweave is going to do with the information.
Sharon wrote re: Looking In The Mirror
on Mon, Aug 13 2007 7:09 PM
Thank you so much for reminding us of the one thing we often forget. It's what's inside that counts!
DeborahT wrote re: Looking In The Mirror
on Mon, Aug 13 2007 7:09 PM
It's interesting to see the bell curve in sizes in the graph. I have a question about the Corset Pullover - what kind of ease is built into the pattern? As someone with a 44" bust, do I make the 43 3/4" size, or the next size up?
CateF wrote re: Looking In The Mirror
on Mon, Aug 13 2007 7:09 PM
When you devise your new survey, please include arm length. For some reason, pattern writers seem to think that as you go up in size your arms get longer.
JoanneP wrote re: Looking In The Mirror
on Mon, Aug 13 2007 7:14 PM
I give up. Why are there two lines for each size?
Barclay wrote re: Looking In The Mirror
on Mon, Aug 13 2007 7:17 PM
Interesting choice, Robin Melanson's Corset Pullover. I made that when it was published in IK, and it was the single most disappointing garment I've ever knitted. Mostly, I think, because the model in the picture is a size two, and my expectations were inappropriate for the item. I am a size 14. She looks waifish and piquant, and I looked roly poly. Ugh! It was so depressing! That design makes me cranky every time I see it!
J wrote re: Looking In The Mirror
on Mon, Aug 13 2007 7:29 PM
I like the looks of the corset pullover; but I would like to see photos of sweaters with the model standing and also back views. It might better help me, who is not "model size", decide if the style would look good on me coming and going.
Jean
MickelleS wrote re: Looking In The Mirror
on Mon, Aug 13 2007 7:30 PM
You are beautiful Sandi! Every time I see a picture of you, I think so. You've got an infectious smile. And thanks for the Corset Pullover pattern. I'm one of those waifish size two girls with sticks for arms. I've wanted to do this pattern for awhile after seeing a photo of it. You've made my day!
NatashaH wrote re: Looking In The Mirror
on Mon, Aug 13 2007 7:38 PM
Hmmmmmm.... so 14% are 34" - 36", 12% are 38" - 40", but the whole 15" is 37"?? (I wish I had the quizzical MSN smiley on here...)
Poor Sandi - nothing is ever straight forward is it?
KarenB wrote re: Looking In The Mirror
on Mon, Aug 13 2007 7:41 PM
I'm petite and adjust most patterns. The hardest part is shortening the sleeve cap to fit a smaller armhole. I can do it
Karen E wrote re: Looking In The Mirror
on Mon, Aug 13 2007 7:47 PM
The mirror I really like (& want) is my mom's 3 way full length mirror. It moved in when I moved out to go to college. I can't tell you how many times I have been pleasantly surprised to see how things fit back there. Sure beats worrying and guessing and is worth the drive across town. Correcting the fit is pleasant when you KNOW the truth, and eases the mind of the self conscious. Karen
MegB wrote re: Looking In The Mirror
on Mon, Aug 13 2007 8:01 PM
Sandi, you are amazing! Thank you for your post. I have, as your grandfather did, put little post notes, not just on the mirror but in the closet on clothes that I thought I would never wear because of.... well whatever. The main point is that, no matter what size or shape we are, we are all beautiful and wonderful. I plan to share that vision with as many people as I can in my life; not just through my knitting, but in all ways. Again, Thank you! Meg, a knitting soapgal in Redrock Country Southwest.
ConnieM wrote re: Looking In The Mirror
on Mon, Aug 13 2007 8:03 PM
What a wonderful positive Grand-father you had! Being the bespectacled, freckle-face, red-head with brown eyes once described as Pig's Eyes because of the thick lenses, I could have used that image when I was growing up.
Nice to know I'm average sized even if I don't match the fashion model image.
I like the idea of the 3-way from Karen Emrey too. The back is as important as the front. Having a dress form for tryon helps, even in back.
Connie L. Mallette
DianaTroldahl wrote re: Looking In The Mirror
on Mon, Aug 13 2007 8:08 PM
Sandi wrote "Your passion and desire to knit well-fitting garments for yourselves, no matter your size or shape, shows that deep inside yourself, no matter what society says, you, too, know that you are beautiful."
I was very moved by your words. I hadn't made the connection between my increasingly healthy self-image and taking the time to knit all those extra stitches to make a sweater fit my special curves. Wonderful! I love IK and its editors more with each issue, and Knitting Daily ROCKS!!!
Nishanna wrote re: Looking In The Mirror
on Mon, Aug 13 2007 8:13 PM
You reminded me of the world wide exhibitions of "you are beautiful"
http://www.you-are-beautiful.com/INSTALLATIONS.htm
EVJ wrote re: Looking In The Mirror
on Mon, Aug 13 2007 8:23 PM
The shape the data produced on this graph resembles a breast in profile (ala Madonna).
HarriettT wrote re: Looking In The Mirror
on Mon, Aug 13 2007 8:23 PM
After reading the instructions for the "corset," I decided it was definitely NOT something I wanted to create -- or even attempt to create! Thank goodness we're living in a different generation!
JessicaC wrote re: Looking In The Mirror
on Mon, Aug 13 2007 8:31 PM
I can't wait to see the pictures of the Corset Pullover. I bought yarn for that project last summer but am afraid to start because I'm not sure how the design will look on me (I'm 5'-4" and a curvy size 12).I can't wait to see the pictures of the Corset Pullover. I bought yarn for that project last summer but am afraid to start because I'm not sure how the design will look on me (I'm 5'-4" and a curvy size 12).
CarolineF wrote re: Looking In The Mirror
on Mon, Aug 13 2007 8:37 PM
Wow, not what I expected to see. I tend to like to make 36-38 inch sweaters, which is usually the smallest size available. I expected the 'bump' in the results to be at 44 or so.
I so agree with showing the sweater on multiple sizes of models. It is great for the caption to say what size is shown, it's better than no info, but to see both a 36 and a 42 would be so much more educational.
Stitch-ayWoman wrote re: Looking In The Mirror
on Mon, Aug 13 2007 8:39 PM
I was a little surprised to not see a higher percentage of 50" and over, but it is interesting to see how many are over 40". The last time I had a 40" bust measurement I was wearing a size 16 blouse and a 14 everywhere else, and I had to nip in my shirts at the waist. (16 was the only size where my girls didn't burst out of the buttons). Of course, I crossed the "no more button front tops" line a long time ago.
Interesting survey! I hope it will induce the designers to go up to at least 50" on most patterns, (and since I am 52-54 that would be especially exciting) but in any event, a wider range of sizes on more patterns would be a step in the right direction.
I do agree, however, (without feeling defensive about it) that most people are going to have to alter something or other about most patterns if they want their garments to look really flattering, so I still think that a comprehensive technical series on altering patterns would be the best move of all. Some designers are writing about this in different books, but to have a whole editorial team of knitters working on a series would really be something!
Stitch-ayWoman wrote re: Looking In The Mirror
on Mon, Aug 13 2007 8:42 PM
Also, if my dream comes true someday and I get designs published, and I fail to include schematics, somebody whup me upside the head. I'm glad that IK includes schematics.
Susan wrote re: Looking In The Mirror
on Mon, Aug 13 2007 8:56 PM
I find the survey reassuring. I truly feared that the 'plus-sized' women were going to out number the 'average'. I think I've been listening to too much tv news, which is focused on reporting that so many in America are overweight. Thank goodness, we are mostly average, not overweight, not underweight, just us. Yes, we are beautiful, but let us also not forget we can be better.
Sherry wrote re: Looking In The Mirror
on Mon, Aug 13 2007 9:00 PM
Hello Everyone, I am so excited and have decided this is the perfect place to share :-) I managed to start my Icelandic Shawl this weekend !!!!!!!!!! I am using KnitPicks Memories 100% merino wool in Yukon. I love the mixed color variety yarns :-) I am on row 16 but I fell in love with the pattern when it was first posted here. More later about my progress since I have discovered I truly love using charts after completing the shrug from the Gathering of Lace book.
Lisa wrote re: Looking In The Mirror
on Mon, Aug 13 2007 9:09 PM
This is a wonderful survey! It's wonderful to see the diversity of women and men replying, large and small. I also expected to see the largest response in that 42-44 range so this is a real eye opener for me.

The problems I have with the majority of patterns for long sleeved garments is arm circumference. My biceps tend to be on the beefy side and need a larger sleeve circumference. Somtimes this is an easy fix, others not so much. I know I would love to see a series on how to alter a pattern to fit me, esp when it's altering a complicated pattern like lace or cabling.

Keep up the fantastic work, Sandi!
AngeliaSharp wrote re: Looking In The Mirror
on Mon, Aug 13 2007 9:09 PM
I am tall (5'9), thin, and have a teeny bust (33"), so I likely am somewhat shaped like many of the models you use. However, because of my height and freakishly broad shoulders and long arms, the size 33 or so that I normally knit just doesn't quite work, so I tweak and tweak until I get it right. Well, as right as I can get it. I really would like to know the measurements of the models you use. Heck, if they're too shy, I'll model something and let you state exactly what my measurements are for every body part the garment involves. I don't care as long as I'm contributing to the greater knitting good.

I'll also chime in with the others and state that I would LOVE to see garments modeled by women of all sizes and shapes (the two are NOT the same, as many have noted).

And...please please tell us the ease!
KathyH wrote re: Looking In The Mirror
on Mon, Aug 13 2007 9:43 PM
I have to say that I find it incredible that the Knitting Daily staff ponders such things as what will make their readers happy. Amazing that you care enough about us to work at helping us to properly size what we knit! Can you take over other areas such as shoe & clothing sales, maybe computers.....? Thanks for your hard work, and for creating this forum for knitters!
KristenM wrote re: Looking In The Mirror
on Mon, Aug 13 2007 9:46 PM
For the words on the mirror...use Wall Words dot com. Definately...the more measurements the better. I have a really long torso and always need to add length.
KathleenE wrote re: Looking In The Mirror
on Mon, Aug 13 2007 9:57 PM
You know, my shape has changed more than my measurements as the years have progressed (a big thanks to Mr. Gravity). Also my sense of style and what I feel looks good to and on me. (Nobody wants to see MY belly button). Is there some way to account for the changes wrought by time (without getting too icky about age) in a survey? Maybe just asking how many of us are comfortable displaying our belly buttons to the public?
MarilynG wrote re: Looking In The Mirror
on Mon, Aug 13 2007 10:13 PM
I think this is not such a great graph-difficult to read and interpret the data--what was the variance in the data? There could or could not be any significant at all to the apparent differences in the #'s of people with different size busts or not, depending on the variance. You need to put in the standard deviation for each bar so we can see what's going on here.
KelleyD wrote re: Looking In The Mirror
on Mon, Aug 13 2007 10:23 PM
Since you are devising a survery for sizing, perhaps you could have us input our measurements, say bust, ribs, waist and hips....then allow you survey to calculate the variance between the measurements.....it should give you a basic picutre of how many have a little variation between the bust and waist measurement, and those that have a lot, for instance. If you like, contact me, and I can give you more detail.
BeckyG wrote re: Looking In The Mirror
on Mon, Aug 13 2007 10:35 PM
What I find interesting is that nearly 60% of the responses were above the 36-38" group. That is not my understanding of a bell curve at all! The sweater on the model in the corset pattern is listed as 35 1/4". So according to our survey, something like 75% of the readers are larger than the sweater. That doesn't sound like a realistic model to me. And it doesn't sound like its likely to give an accurate representation of fit for that 75% of readers.

Can someone clarify which measurements are usually used for a small, medium, large, etc.? Also, looking back to the post from Sandi on 8/8/07 where she detailed the size ranges of the projects in the upcoming issue, I notice that only 6 of the 16 sweaters are sized above 50". That's only slightly better than a third. Here the issue isn't the percentage of women above 50" but the fact that those who are above 50" are only getting 1/3 the usable patterns that a smaller person is. And paying the same price! That means less willingness to shell out money for a magazine (particularly a subscription). I'm not sure what the answer is, I have no suggestions really. But these are the parts that I find interesting here.
Willa JeanD wrote re: Looking In The Mirror
on Mon, Aug 13 2007 10:45 PM
YOU are beautiful. Your grandfather was right. And I'd think so even if I'd never seen your picture.
I can't tell you how much I enjoy Knitting Daily.
I'm not really surprised by the survey results, though if you're taking request....
I don't show my belly button either, but changing length is not usually a problem for me. What I can't do is design a sleeve cap, and my arms just aren't as pretty as they used to be. I love many of your sleeveless designs, but wouldn't personally wear them unless I could add a cap or flutter sleeve or something. My apologies to the designers, but ....
CiraW wrote re: Looking In The Mirror
on Mon, Aug 13 2007 10:53 PM
Could the model BE ANY TALLER & THINNER and still be alive!!!!! It will be interesting to see the top on other shapes - try a 5'0', 160 pound person - or even a more "normal body size and shape!!!!!
SharonH wrote re: Looking In The Mirror
on Mon, Aug 13 2007 10:56 PM
I'd like to remind Susan and everyone else that "average" doesn't mean much and it certainly doesn't mean that you aren't over or under weight. In college I was a size 14 marathoner who could do a 7 minute mile. I'm bigger now that I've stopped running 40-60 miles a week, but a lot of what size you wear has to do with your frame. I will never wear an average size and if I did, I'd be a very ill girl.
Kabira wrote re: Looking In The Mirror
on Mon, Aug 13 2007 10:59 PM
TERRIFIC that so many people responded - !!!!
And - a quick adding up of percentages - indicates that about 50% of those who responded have busts over 40 inches. It would be so great to see 50% of the pictured models in the magazine reflecting this!!!! And to have 50% of the clothing designs offered be flattering to people with busts greater than 40 inches. Thank you so much for doing this research and to the IK staff for seriously considering the information.
Jenifleur wrote re: Looking In The Mirror
on Mon, Aug 13 2007 11:00 PM
Sandi, since you are now our voice to Interweave Knits, I ask you: is it possible to get multiple size views from the magazine? I just made the Wing Top from the summer issue and I'm nearly exactly average according to the graph. Everyone tells me they'd never think this would look good on anyone other than the petite and perfect, yet it works on my size. I feel there must be many people out there willing to test knit the designs for almost nothing. Enabling average people to see how it would look on them would be invaluable and a credit to the publication. The models are lovely, but they don't represent the bulk of the readership. Small and large, we need to find knits that make us look and feel good!
PaulineL wrote re: Looking In The Mirror
on Mon, Aug 13 2007 11:13 PM
Interesting survey results, but not so surprising that sizes are larger. Thank you for looking into this.

I noticed a comment, in Notes, on the corset pattern about ease and how to change it. Sandi, is that a new comment? I suspect it is. Thank you.
ChristineB wrote re: Looking In The Mirror
on Tue, Aug 14 2007 12:19 AM
I agree with an earlier comment about showing how to adjust armholes and sleeve widths. I can figure out how to adjust length
Marg wrote re: Looking In The Mirror
on Tue, Aug 14 2007 2:08 AM
Does this mean that IK could consider designing sweaters for and modelling them on models sized above 40" rather than on flat-chested coathangers?
Sarah wrote re: Looking In The Mirror
on Tue, Aug 14 2007 3:17 AM
It's about what I'd expected to see. I just wish most clothing designers would expect to see it, too. Then they might design stuff that SUITS people with curves. In addition to the mirror, may I suggest a duct-tape dummy? Mine went a long way to convincing me that I'm not fat, just curved. And it's very useful to fit stuff on, too.
EvaF wrote re: Looking In The Mirror
on Tue, Aug 14 2007 3:26 AM
We are indeed all different in size and shape. As a bust 44 person I have problems with the shoulders. My shoulders have not become broader when my size has increased and that makes fitted sleeves in lager garment drop down, not looking that good at all. Well, I usually changes the patterns allot to make them fit my shape. I can tell you right now that the corset Pullover will need to be changed allot to fit me nicely.
When it comes to the models in Interweave Knits they are sometimes to thin for the garments, that is when you see he garment on a more shapely woman they suddenly looks so much more interesting. It is natural that a top on a petite model will not look the same on a full figured woman.
ChrisH wrote re: Looking In The Mirror
on Tue, Aug 14 2007 3:40 AM
I love the Corset Pullover but cannot imagine it on my 42H bustline! I think it will be one to dream on instead.
SaraJ wrote re: Looking In The Mirror
on Tue, Aug 14 2007 4:56 AM
Thank you SO much for taking our feelings, thoughts, sizes, and shapes in to consideration! I believe I'm going to subscribe as soon as I'm past the expenses of gearing up my dd for a new school year have passed. Because I have hope that more will be done to make more of the content I'd be paying for, actually be usable for me. (Echoing what someone said above about plus-size women and that we pay same price, for a lot fewer patterns per issue that we can use; I would guess that the same issue applies to petites, too, since I've read in these discussions that many patterns do not go small enough for their needs.)

I echo the desire for an article on adding sleeves to sleeveless designs (which would also be used by me to change the sleeve on a design, as I'd be "deleting" the sleeve called for, I'd need to know how to add another sleeve as well as adjust the armhole area, in general!)

Also, how to change drop-shoulder sleeves, which is a bit more problematic because I'd have to narrow the whole pattern. But I don't know if there's other issues besides that.

Boy, I'm ambitious for a newbie knitter, but Knitting Daily, especially Sandi's particular enthusiasm, confidence, and encouragement to knitters and about knitting, is part of what is making me feel that attempting these sorts of things might be possible. Discussions like these also have helped that feeling.

I enjoyed the interview with Eunny last week, although hoped there was even more (perhaps every now and then you can bring us more, from then-current interviews!). After reviewing my Ravelry queue, and seeing how many IW designs are in there (as I'm optimistic that by the time I eventually get to them I'll have learned a lot more about knitting, adjusting, etc.), and reviewing the one issue I have (Spring 07), as well as the online pics from Fall 07 back through a year's worth of issues, I see MUCH I like/love! Another reason I'll be subscribing (with the hope that I'll be learning, some of it from IW Knits, about shaping/fitting)!
KristenH wrote re: Looking In The Mirror
on Tue, Aug 14 2007 4:59 AM
I am a little surprised at the survey results, but not terribly. For all the ranting and raving about how fat we Americans are, I expected the middle range to be higher. I am a plus sized woman and have been happy that IK generally presents a wide range of styles that would look good on different shapes (as opposed to other knitting magazines). For the other plus-sized women out there, I strongly suggest you take a look at the shaping and style suggestions in Big Girl Knits by Jillian Moreno and Amy Singer. Very good advice to be had there, though I think the title is a bit unfortunate.
NathalieS wrote re: Looking In The Mirror
on Tue, Aug 14 2007 5:03 AM
I'm glad to see that I am of an average size ... when it comes to bust size.But my main problem is on the length of the pattern as I am rather tall ( 1m82 ) it is sometimes difficult for me ( I know I'm not an advanced knitter ! ) to adapt the patterns you propose, and I don't like to wear clothes that are too short I look like a little girl that has grown too fast! Thanks for this very interesting magazine...and pardon my English ( I may have made many mistakes ! )but I am French!
Ruthmel1 wrote re: Looking In The Mirror
on Tue, Aug 14 2007 5:05 AM
I also was surprised by the survey. I also thought that the larger sizes would be higher.
IK already caters very well for my size 42" unlike your British counter parts!
I love the corset top and will put it on my very long and increasing 'to do 'list!!
CynthiaF wrote re: Looking In The Mirror
on Tue, Aug 14 2007 6:24 AM
Could you look into whether there are good, reasonably affordable dress-form "manequins" that can be adjusted to one's own measurements? A full length mirror is fine, but you can't really work on most of the 360 degrees of a garment on yourself -- even if you COULD see the full view well. For really dedicated knitters, it might be worth the investment to have a version of "you" that you can try things on, and adjust to fit, as you knit (or sew, or crochet, or whatever.)
Cyn
LaurenH wrote re: Looking In The Mirror
on Tue, Aug 14 2007 7:20 AM
Sandi - great idea about getting a mirror. As you look around at different styles you're considering getting for Christmas, please let us know if you learn any mirror-buying tips. For instance, does a perfectly vertical mirror work better than one that's tilted back slightly on an A-frame? Does the length or shape of the mirror make a difference? Its height off the floor?
Daniele wrote re: Looking In The Mirror
on Tue, Aug 14 2007 7:54 AM
Love the Pullover!! Whenever you add a "new" pattern to Knitting Daily, is it on your daily post, or are there others in the free pattern directory that are added in daily too? Thanks! Daniele
DawneL wrote re: Looking In The Mirror
on Tue, Aug 14 2007 8:03 AM
Thanks for all the great topics and advice in Knitting Daily. I am really enjoying reading everything you share, and I can tell you are workng extra hard to meet all the needs of all the people who knit and read IK ( very lofty). I am commencing knitting the Bella Blouse and wondering if additional photos are available for those of us who would like to see it up a little closer ?! I wish there were closer views of the Corset Pullover too. Again thanks for all the great info you are giving us daily !
Dawne